Tradition and the Transformation of Styles:
A Documentation and Analysis of the Horned Carnival Masks
Of the Dominican Republic, Venezuela, and Puerto Rico
--- An Artist’s Response
Mark Gordon
Summer 1987; revised January 2006
[--See linked maskmaking images from field
research.]
Research Objectives
As a visual
artist and graduate student at The Ohio State University, I was interested in
traditional cultural manifestations of visual imagery, both for my own artistic
development and to share images with my students.
The zoomorphic images embodied in
Dominican horned masks have served as a source of
inspiration in my artwork. When horns are encountered in archetypal visual
contexts such as the Minoan cult shrines of Crete and at
the Catal Huyuk altars in Anatolia,
horns serve a semiotic function as symbols of power, wealth, sustenance,
virility and agricultural growth. In contrast, horned masks can serve as
threatening reminders of mortality: in the final account, these masks suggest
animal skulls, especially bucrania.
There has
been a shortage of articles published dealing specifically with the Dominican
Republic’s maskmaking
tradition, either in English or in Spanish. A short exhibition catalogue
published in 1985 by Parsons School of Design, and a documentary, “Caretas de Carnaval,” by Jaime Piña—with narration by the formidable Fradique Lizardo—was
sponsored by the Dominican telephone company CODETEL. This short video gives an
overview of the country’s various regional styles of
masks.
The Dominican
traditions of carnaval
and fiesta patronal,
and therefore also of these celebration-related masks, were formed by the
interaction of the cultural worlds of Sub-Saharan Africa, Catholic Spain and
indigenous Taíno and Carib
tribes of the island of Hispañola.
From 1980
to 1983 I lived in La Romana, a town on the
southeastern coast of the Dominican Republic,
where my task was designing and implementing a pottery training program for
local youths. I am fluent in Spanish and can communicate effectively in the Caribbean
dialects. An 18-month period in 1984-85, spent in travel and crafts
documentation, helped hone my skill at interviewing and documenting traditional
crafts. My 1987 travel in the Caribbean concentrated on
the Dominican Republic,
which boasts strong traditions of original folk-art in Carnival, Independence
Day, and regional festival (fiesta patronal) masks.
Caribbean
maskmakers are artist/craftsmen; my field study
explored their backgrounds, training, attitudes toward work, and role in
society. In anthropological terms, masking is characterized by a structured
“corporate sequence” of patronage, inspiration, tradition, craftsmanship, and
the embodiment of a new personality in a limited time-frame.
In the course
of the investigation, various questions emerged. For example, in the Dominican Republic, both men and women
make masks; why is there no strict sexual differentiation, with men as the sole
maskmakers, as is the case in most of West Africa? The Akkan taboo on
figurative image-making by women is to avoid conflation of the role of
mask/image-maker with the role of child-bearer and “person-creator.”
Whence come
the Caribbean maskmakers’
inspiration and motivation---is it a natural (or inevitable) development
resulting from synchretized cultural traditions? Is some of the contemporary inspiration, as MacLuan might argue, a response to modern media influences?
In the economic context, what are the roles of the marketplace in determining
mask styles? What characterized Dominican maskmaking
of 30 years ago, and what will become of the tradition 30 years hence? These
problems lead into the intriguing realm of artistic transculturation.
This documentation project had the goal of enhancing understanding of this
rapidly transforming craft and aid in the documentary preservation of these valuable
traditions.
The Dominican
Republic’s maskmaking
tradition centers in La Vega, Montecristi, Santo
Domingo, and Santiago de los
Caballeros (neighborhoods Los Pepinos and Las Joyas). To aid in contextualizing Dominican masks within
the region, I added supplementary travel to maskmaking centers in Venezuela
and Puerto Rico. Venezuela’s
remaining indigenous tribes of the Orinoco
River area, considered to be the
same provenance as the now-extinct Taínos of Hispañola (Lovens, 1935, et.
al.), parallel some practices of Dominican festival masking. Current centers of
maskmaking are located in the Venezuelan villages of Ocumare de la Costa, San Francisco de Paula de Yare, and Ocumare de Tuy. Puerto
Rico’s maskmaking centers of Hatillo and Loíza Aldea (a village of predominantly African descent, and home
to the “Festival Africana’ in July) have strong semiotic connections to Afro-Cuban
santeria, a phenomenon that is currently less observable in the Dominican contemporary
traditions.
In analyzing contemporary Caribbean
festival masking one must look to its origins. The observer is confronted with archetypal
images of ritual piety used in the context of a festival. Caribbean
santería, a syncretism bringing together archetypes
of African deities [especially Obatala, Shango, Yemaya, Ochun] and Christian-saint
imagery, includes invocations evidenced during Carnival through the use of
particular color-schemes, iconic masks, and recitations of litany. A plethora of plausible theories account for festival masking in
the Caribbean. In horned masks, there is an invocation of agricultural
and human fertility. Perhaps this derives from collective subconscious:
hunters’ archetypes containing shamanistic rituals were intended to address
nature-gods, to placate, beseech, cajole, to exorcse,
to frighten. This suggests one explanation of the origins of mask-use in
Africa: to frighten children away from taboo objects or places, images were
painted or carved, Perhaps also, African secret societies developed mask use as
apotropaic
devices--to protect totemic animal-spirits and, in turn, to seek power and
protection for themselves.
The role of
mask-created social persona in West Africa is often one
in which the mask becomes prescriptive
for a ritualized storytelling dance often involving patterned, orchestrated
social interactions. Masking in the modern-day Caribbean
serves instead to increase freedom of
social interaction: as Turner points out, festival masking is the annual
opportunity to acceptably ignore social conventions. Thus, openness could be
permitted--often allowing for the temporary elimination of taboos against sexual
promiscuity or violence. This process temporarily transforms and possibly
revitalizes social interaction within a community. Both African and Caribbean
manifestations provide for a tuning-in
to society’s collective unconscious through celebratory ritual. However, the
suspension of disbelief necessary for a “profound engagement of the self in the
process” (Stewart, 1986) seems less intense in contemporary Dominican
celebrations.
Traditional Caribbean
carnaval
can create a momentary destabilization of the existing cultural organization,
rejuvenating the social calendar. During carnival
the populace is given the opportunity to do what is normally condemned by
society and the Church. Carnaval creates temporary anonymity, freedom
and even danger in interpersonal relationship. Masking has the effect of
creating a context in which political differences are safely aired through
ritualized, regulated social conflict. The masked celebrations provide for the discontented
poor a socially-acceptable context within which to voice political
dissatisfaction through regulated enactments of put-on persona—in effect, acting as a safety valve for the
status-quo. According to Paz, a generalized feeling of belonging can lead to
increased awareness of national bonds: a number of Latin American national
independence movements have begun with a grito (shout, calling-out) during festival celebrations.
Festival masking supports rites of
initiation into an inner group within society.
Perhaps
a synthesis appears between the Spanish cofradía, an informal brotherhood prevalent in 16th
century Seville, the city through which many of the early Spanish conquistadores and colonistas passed, and a later transformation into the Caribbean hijos de santos. According to F. Otiz,
these latter groups were called ñañigo---organized societies affiliated with totemic
animals---of the Yoruba of Nigeria, the Bantu of central Africa,
the Fon of Benin, the Ewe of Togo, and the Mandingo
of Senegal.
In considering craft process and
materials, it is natural to conclude that the most direct early masks consisted
simply of paint: a decorated face may be the most elemental of masks. Bone
masks made from animal skulls were used by the stalker-cultures of prehistoric England.
Another early form of mask is evidenced by death-masks from ancient Jericho:
“restored” plastered ancestral skulls faithfully reconstructed with additions
of clay and proto-plaster. The wide variety of materials used in maskmaking includes wood, clay, stone, leather (tanned
hides as well as alligator and snakeskins), cloth,
feathers, gourds, metals (copper, silver gold, window screen, tin cans--the
Dominican hoja-lata or “tin-can-leaf”), aluminum foil,
fabric, rope (raffia, jute, sisal), plaster, papier mache, cardboard, and tree bark. There is evidence for
incorporation of such exotica as turquoise, jade, onyx, horn, amber, ribbons,
bells, mirrors, hair, lacquer, shells, copper, silver, gold, and dried
grasshoppers.
[A side note on the use of rhythmic drums:
Patterned
sequences of sounds are canonized in the language of West African talking drums: in Ghana,
even poetry can be expressed. These rhythms attain a level of complexity and
standardization permitting transmittal of detailed long-distance messages. In
Dominican festivals it seems that drums are used for simple musical
accompaniment; this could be characterized by the term jitanjafora—“sound without
meaning.” But perhaps there is more here
than meets the eye---or ear…In Panama, juego de congos
drumming tells the story of the cimarrones,
escaped slaves protesting against the colonial system through sabotage,
rebellion, even suicide.]
The result
of the field study was to develop a video and slide presentation, a photographic exhibit,
and a large field sample display. The 1987 documentary project was of an
exploratory nature that, in terms of crafts ethnology, has the potential to
contribute to scholarship in the field of the Caribbean
masking and maskmaking traditions.
Mark Gordon
Associate Professor
Art Department
Barton College
Wilson, NC 27893
mgordon@barton.edu
.